From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Holler Subject: Re: bridge/netfilter: regression in 2.6.39.1 Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 15:29:59 +0200 Message-ID: <4DECD657.9010807@ahsoftware.de> References: <4DE93422.3070000@ahsoftware.de> <20110606111507.GA1000@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <4DECBEA3.6070408@ahsoftware.de> <1307362358.3098.6.camel@edumazet-laptop> <4DECCCC0.70905@ahsoftware.de> <1307366166.3098.15.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Neil Horman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Miller , Herbert Xu , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from h1446028.stratoserver.net ([85.214.92.142]:40311 "EHLO mail.ahsoftware.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751425Ab1FFNaL (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:30:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1307366166.3098.15.camel@edumazet-laptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > Nice, now please submit a patch with 0972ddb237 as a guideline. > > BTW, you could also check other struct dst_ops methods for > bridge/netfilter: Sorry, but I prefer to submit patches I understand by myself and for stuff I know something about. The patch in my first mail was just meant as a quick fix (which seemed to work here). So even if I might be able to construct a working patch using commit 0972ddb237, I don't think I should do that. Regards, Alexander