netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	pablo@netfilter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use unsigned variables for packet lengths in ip[6]_queue.
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:19:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DEE4199.3090300@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110607143924.GA5257@redhat.com>

On 07.06.2011 16:39, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 04:19:08PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>  
>  > >>> With the patch below, I haven't been able to reproduce the problem, but
>  > >>> I don't know if I've inadvertantly broken some other behaviour somewhere
>  > >>> deeper in netlink where this is valid.
>  > > 
>  > > This is fine, but I'm wondering whether this can really fix the problem
>  > > you've been seeing. Before the packet is reallocated, the length of
>  > > nlmsglen - NLMSGLEN(0) - sizeof(struct ipq_peer_msg) is compared to
>  > > ipq_peer_msg->data_len, so both values need to be wrong.
>  > > ipq_peer_msg->data_len is a size_t, so it's unsigned.
>  > > 
>  > > I think what we should additionally do is verify that data_len < 65535
>  > > since that's the maximum size of an IP packet.
>  > 
>  > We're actually already doing this. This makes it even more strange that
>  > you're seeing this problem. Could you send me your testcase?
> 
> I don't have a standalone test-case, just a generic fuzzing tool that passes
> sockets to various syscalls.  You can clone it from git://git.codemonkey.org.uk/trinity.git/
> (the test-random.sh should explain how to use it)

Thanks, that explains the weird values. Still wondering how it managed
to get passed the ipq_peer_msg length check.

Anyways, I'll give it a try myself.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-07 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-20  1:42 ipqueue allocation failure Dave Jones
2011-04-20  3:41 ` David Miller
2011-04-20  5:27   ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-28  0:36   ` [PATCH] Use unsigned variables for packet lengths in ip[6]_queue Dave Jones
2011-06-02 19:24     ` Dave Jones
2011-06-02 20:57     ` David Miller
2011-06-07 12:59       ` Patrick McHardy
2011-06-07 14:19         ` Patrick McHardy
2011-06-07 14:39           ` Dave Jones
2011-06-07 15:19             ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2011-06-03 10:07     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-04-21 15:13 ` ipqueue allocation failure Patrick McHardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DEE4199.3090300@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).