From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: "Michał Mirosław" <mirqus@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Allow NICs to pass Frame Checksum up the stack.
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:58:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DFBC00F.4000500@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1308344222.2831.20.camel@bwh-desktop>
On 06/17/2011 01:57 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 13:48 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
>> On 06/17/2011 01:00 PM, Michał Mirosław wrote:
>>> 2011/6/17<greearb@candelatech.com>:
>>>> From: Ben Greear<greearb@candelatech.com>
>>>>
>>>> This series provides ethtool support to set and get the rx-checksum
>>>> flag, and adds support to the e100 driver.
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> If you want to test the new features approach, you can shave top bit
>>> off NETIF_F_GSO_MASK (there are two unused bits there). The
>>> introducing patch will be +2 lines (+1 dev.c, +1 ethtool.c),
>>> implementation in e100: 20 lines less than patch you sent, ethtool
>>> userspace changes: none (assuming
>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/96374/ or equivalent applied).
>>
>> Well, is that patch going in?
>>
>> How do we get more bits if we need more than two? Totally new
>> API?
>
> See this thread:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/196684
It's idle for 11 days. Seems dead in the water if you ask me.
Thanks,
Ben
>
> Ben.
>
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-17 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-17 19:40 [PATCH 0/2] Allow NICs to pass Frame Checksum up the stack greearb
2011-06-17 19:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] net: Support getting/setting RX-FCS in drivers greearb
2011-06-17 19:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] e100: Support receiving Ethernet FCS greearb
2011-06-18 1:47 ` Jeff Kirsher
2011-06-17 20:00 ` [PATCH 0/2] Allow NICs to pass Frame Checksum up the stack Michał Mirosław
2011-06-17 20:48 ` Ben Greear
2011-06-17 20:57 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-06-17 20:58 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2011-06-19 23:21 ` David Miller
2011-06-19 23:51 ` Ben Greear
2011-06-19 23:54 ` David Miller
2011-06-19 23:58 ` Ben Greear
2011-06-19 23:20 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DFBC00F.4000500@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=mirqus@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).