From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Subject: TCP new-reno support?
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 08:50:03 -0700
Message-ID: <4E00BDAB.1040309@candelatech.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172]:37747 "EHLO
	ns3.lanforge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753018Ab1FUPuE (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:50:04 -0400
Received: from [192.168.100.195] (firewall.candelatech.com [70.89.124.249])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by ns3.lanforge.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p5LFo3kf004910
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 08:50:03 -0700
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

I see a large number of TCP congestion algorithms supported, but
nothing that explicitly says newreno.  Is it actually supported?

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com