From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Greear Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH 0/9] Cleanup and extension of netdev features Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:43:28 -0700 Message-ID: <4E011080.7000008@candelatech.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Ben Hutchings To: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBNaXJvc8WCYXc=?= Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172]:43290 "EHLO ns3.lanforge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751613Ab1FUVnh (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:43:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/20/2011 12:14 PM, Micha=C5=82 Miros=C5=82aw wrote: > This is a preview of the cleanups pending after getting rid of old > ethtool ops from remaining drivers. Even when skipping patch 1 (seems this was just merged earlier today), these patches do not all apply to net-next. They are also full of white-space warnings. Please re-post them when you sync against upstream and I'll try to do some testing. Also, do you have a cooresponding patch against ethtool to make it able to handle the new 64-bit flags? Thanks, Ben --=20 Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com