From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rick Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH] pktgen: Clone skb to avoid corruption of skbs in ndo_start_xmit methods Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:25:00 -0700 Message-ID: <4E26205C.1040106@hp.com> References: <1311105179-26408-1-git-send-email-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> <1311105738.3113.11.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20110719202922.GA2352@minipsycho> <1311108107.3113.22.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20110720001904.GA1992@neilslaptop.think-freely.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Eric Dumazet , Jiri Pirko , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Dobriyan , "David S. Miller" To: Neil Horman Return-path: Received: from g4t0014.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.17]:6437 "EHLO g4t0014.houston.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752264Ab1GTAZD (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:25:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110720001904.GA1992@neilslaptop.think-freely.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: How "everyday use" is pktgen considered? As "everyday use" as netperf/iperf/whatnot? Is it actually considered something one would run on production rather than test systems? rick jones