From: Stephen Clark <sclark46@earthlink.net>
To: Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org>
Cc: "Rémi Denis-Courmont" <remi@remlab.net>,
"Linux Kernel Network Developers" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux vs FreeBSD Which is correct.
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:42:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E4D08B8.8020309@earthlink.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E4C2178.1000809@plouf.fr.eu.org>
On 08/17/2011 04:15 PM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Stephen Clark a écrit :
>
>> On 08/17/2011 01:17 PM, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
>>
>>> Le mercredi 17 août 2011 20:03:18 Stephen Clark, vous avez écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>>> I have run into a situation where if I ping our HQ the response comes
>>>> back on a different
>>>> interface than what the request went out on. FreeBSD is happy and says
>>>> it got the response,
>>>> Linux is not and gives no indication it got a response.
>>>>
>>>> So is FreeBSD wrong or is Linux wrong?
>>>>
> Neither is right or wrong. It partly depends whether you want to enforce
> so-called "weak" or "strong" host model.
>
>
>>> Most distributions enable reverse path filtering by default.
>>> It can be disabled:
>>> # echo -n 0> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/rp_filter
>>>
>>> But you should probably fix the configuration instead (e.g. /etc/sysctl.conf).
>>>
>>>
>> Sorry that didn't help either.
>>
> Since some kernel version the logic of this sysctl has changed from
> AND(all, $interface) to MAX(all, $interface). So you must set
> net/ipv4/conf/$interface/rp_filter to 0 too to disable it.
> Or set net/ipv4/conf/all/rp_filter to 2 to make it weaker.
>
>
I guess I don't really understand what reverse path filter stuff is all
about, much less making it weaker.
But using 2 made the pings responses be seen.
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety,
deserve neither liberty nor safety." (Ben Franklin)
"The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty
decreases." (Thomas Jefferson)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-18 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-17 17:03 Linux vs FreeBSD Which is correct Stephen Clark
2011-08-17 17:10 ` Emil S Tantilov
2011-08-17 17:20 ` Stephen Clark
2011-08-17 17:17 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2011-08-17 19:44 ` Stephen Clark
2011-08-17 20:15 ` Pascal Hambourg
2011-08-18 12:42 ` Stephen Clark [this message]
2011-08-19 16:18 ` Chris Friesen
2011-08-19 19:10 ` Stephen Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E4D08B8.8020309@earthlink.net \
--to=sclark46@earthlink.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org \
--cc=remi@remlab.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).