From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bridge: netfilter: work around shared nfct struct
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:08:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E5CE0BD.7040103@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110830125453.GC7548@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc>
On 30.08.2011 14:54, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> wrote:
>> On 30.08.2011 12:57, Florian Westphal wrote:
>>> When incoking iptables hooks from bridge netfilter, the assumption
>>> that non-confirmed skb->nfct is never shared does no longer hold,
>>> as bridge code clones skbs when e.g. forwarding packets to multiple
>>> bridge ports.
>>>
>>> When NFQUEUE is used, we can BUG because nf_nat_setup_info can be
>>> invoked simultaneously for the same conntrack:
>>
>> I'm wondering how this can happen, when flooding packets to multiple
>> ports, they are still processed by the same CPU one after another,
>> so for the second and further packets, nf_nat should notice that
>> the mappings are already set up.
>
> Main problem is that we end up with same ->nfct in both
> INPUT and POSTROUTING (br_pass_frame_up vs. br_forward).
>
> its extremely unlikely but reproduceable with something like
> hping2 -i u1200 -2 -p 138 -d 128 192.168.0.255
>
> (assuming bridge interface has an address within that network).
>
> Also, with recent change nf_reinject can be run in parallel.
> (the original problem was observed on 2.6.32.24, but i can
> reproduce it with nf-next, too).
I see. We still need to avoid the module dependency on nf_conntrack
though, so I think this will have to be fixed in nf_nat_fn().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-30 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-30 10:57 [PATCH] bridge: netfilter: work around shared nfct struct Florian Westphal
2011-08-30 12:43 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-08-30 12:54 ` Florian Westphal
2011-08-30 13:08 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2011-08-30 13:19 ` Florian Westphal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E5CE0BD.7040103@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox