From: Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com>
To: "Michał Mirosław" <mirqus@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, vladz@broadcom.com, dmitry@broadcom.com,
eilong@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] bnx2x: expose HW RX VLAN stripping toggle
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:30:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E5D3A43.1060202@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHXqBFLgTHvxL34eR1qX7nEmntyOBXYrg-7LQvW=d8dnDpbhWg@mail.gmail.com>
On 08/30/2011 08:27 PM, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> It seems rather convoluted and unnecessary that you mirror
> NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX in bp->flags
This mirroring is for the benefit of functions called indirectly from
bnx2x_set_features(). They cannot look at dev->features for
NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX because it's not set before ->ndo_set_features() returns.
> and then also in fp->flags. Are the
> fp->flags strictly mirroring hardware state (as in: there is no way
> the states can differ in any point in time where the flags are
> tested)?
Yes. This is the purpose of the second mirroring of the flag.
> For this to be true, the two functions above need to be
> called only without releasing a lock between them that is also taken
> by receive handler.
The flag propagates from bp->flags to fp->flags between unloading and
reloading the NIC. The receive handler cannot run at the time.
> Isn't there a flag in the rx descriptor of a
> packet that says if VLAN was stripped? (All that flag keeping would be
> unnecessary then.)
There is no such flag, AFAIK.
Michal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-30 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-30 14:30 [PATCH 0/7 net-next] bnx2x: cleanups and VLAN stripping toggle Michal Schmidt
2011-08-30 14:30 ` [PATCH 1/7] bnx2x: remove unused fields in struct bnx2x_func_init_params Michal Schmidt
2011-08-31 10:07 ` Vlad Zolotarov
2011-08-30 14:30 ` [PATCH 2/7] bnx2x: remove the 'leading' arguments Michal Schmidt
2011-08-31 9:57 ` Vlad Zolotarov
2011-08-30 14:30 ` [PATCH 3/7] bnx2x: decrease indentation in bnx2x_rx_int() Michal Schmidt
2011-08-31 10:33 ` Vlad Zolotarov
2011-08-30 14:30 ` [PATCH 4/7] bnx2x: simplify TPA sanity check Michal Schmidt
2011-08-31 10:22 ` Vlad Zolotarov
2011-08-30 14:30 ` [PATCH 5/7] bnx2x: do not set TPA flags and features in bnx2x_init_bp Michal Schmidt
2011-08-30 16:21 ` Vlad Zolotarov
2011-08-30 17:15 ` Michal Schmidt
2011-08-30 14:30 ` [PATCH 6/7] bnx2x: move fp->disable_tpa to ->flags Michal Schmidt
2011-08-30 14:30 ` [PATCH 7/7] bnx2x: expose HW RX VLAN stripping toggle Michal Schmidt
2011-08-30 18:27 ` Michał Mirosław
2011-08-30 19:30 ` Michal Schmidt [this message]
2011-08-30 20:08 ` Michał Mirosław
2011-08-31 12:01 ` Vlad Zolotarov
2011-08-31 13:53 ` Michal Schmidt
2011-08-31 15:07 ` Vlad Zolotarov
2011-08-31 15:37 ` Michal Schmidt
2011-08-31 15:51 ` Michal Schmidt
2011-08-31 16:16 ` Vlad Zolotarov
2011-08-31 18:11 ` Michał Mirosław
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E5D3A43.1060202@redhat.com \
--to=mschmidt@redhat.com \
--cc=dmitry@broadcom.com \
--cc=eilong@broadcom.com \
--cc=mirqus@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vladz@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).