From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Glauber Costa Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] Basic kernel memory functionality for the Memory Controller Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 17:40:11 -0300 Message-ID: <4E76572B.2000904@parallels.com> References: <1316051175-17780-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1316051175-17780-2-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <20110917174535.GA1658@shutemov.name> <4E7567E0.9010401@parallels.com> <20110918190509.GC28057@shutemov.name> <4E764259.5070209@parallels.com> <20110918203931.GA28611@shutemov.name> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , , , , , , , To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110918203931.GA28611@shutemov.name> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 09/18/2011 05:39 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 04:11:21PM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote: >> On 09/18/2011 04:05 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: >>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:39:12AM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote: >>>>> Always zero in root cgroup? >>>> >>>> Yes, if we're not accounting, it should be zero. WARN_ON, maybe? >>> >>> -ENOSYS? >>> >> I'd personally prefer WARN_ON. It is good symmetry from userspace PoV to >> always be able to get a value out of it. Also, it something goes wrong >> and it is not zero for some reason, this will help us find it. > > What's the point to get non-relevant value? > What about -ENOSYS + WARN_ON? > Well, what about not even registering kernel memory files for !root cgroup? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org