From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Wang Subject: Re: [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 0/5] Multiqueue support in tun/tap Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:44:21 +0800 Message-ID: <4E770EF5.90705@redhat.com> References: <20110917055639.32666.89940.stgit@dhcp-91-7.nay.redhat.com.englab.nay.redhat.com> <20110917191709.GA6127@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: krkumar2@in.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, joe@perches.com, shemminger@vyatta.com, mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl, davem@davemloft.net To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110917191709.GA6127@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 09/18/2011 03:17 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 02:02:04PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> A wiki-page was created to narrate the detail design of all parts >> involved in the multi queue implementation: >> http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Multiqueue and some basic tests result >> could be seen in this page >> http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Multiqueue-performance-Sep-13. I would >> post the detail numbers in attachment as the reply of this thread. > Does it make sense to test both with and without RPS in guest? > I've tested with RPS in guest, but didn't see improvements.