From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan-fJ+pQTUTwRTk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: SocketCAN Core Mailing List
<socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org>,
Linux Netdev List
<netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] candev: allow SJW user setting for bittiming calculation
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 18:26:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E7B61C8.8020506@hartkopp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E7B331F.3070801-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
On 09/22/11 15:07, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> On 09/22/2011 12:28 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
>> This patch adds support for SJW user settings to not set the synchronization
>> jump width (SJW) to 1 in any case when using the in-kernel bittiming
>> calculation.
>>
>> The ip-tool from iproute2 already supports to pass the user defined SJW
>> value. The given SJW value is sanitized with the controller specific sjw_max
>> and the calculated tseg2 value. As the SJW can have values up to 4 providing
>> this value will lead to the maximum possible SJW automatically. A higher SJW
>> allows higher controller oscillator tolerances.
(..)
> As I already said, I expected "bt->sjw" to be always 0 when
> can_calc_bittiming() is called. But the software somehow allows to
> preset "bt->sjw", which is not intended as the help of the ip utility shows:
What was the technical reason for this 'not intended' that time?
> I actually hesitate to extend can_calc_bittiming(). I suggest using an
> external tool to calculate proper bit-timing parameters and set them
> with "ip link set DEVICE type can tq ...".
Yes, i know the possibility to specify the bittiming via time-quanta (tq).
But i think the in-kernel bittiming calculation is pretty good and solves most
usual cases. For me it's just an additional requirement to specify SJW as
MIN(tseg2, max_sjw) to extend the clock source tolerance - which can be
provided as an additional option to the bittiming calculation without pain
(IMO). If i can 'tune' the sample point, why should i not have any influence
to the synchronization jump width generation then?
And btw. a help text can really be changed easily ;-)
- [ bitrate BITRATE [ sample-point SAMPLE-POINT] ] |
+ [ bitrate BITRATE [ sample-point SAMPLE-POINT] [sjw SJW] ] |
Regards,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-22 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-22 10:28 [PATCH net-next v2] candev: allow SJW user setting for bittiming calculation Oliver Hartkopp
[not found] ` <4E7B0DE6.9020807-fJ+pQTUTwRTk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-22 13:07 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
[not found] ` <4E7B331F.3070801-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-22 16:26 ` Oliver Hartkopp [this message]
[not found] ` <4E7B61C8.8020506-fJ+pQTUTwRTk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-22 18:10 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
[not found] ` <4E7B7A30.4030707-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-22 19:41 ` Oliver Hartkopp
[not found] ` <4E7B8F63.6060108-fJ+pQTUTwRTk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-23 7:24 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
[not found] ` <4E7C3424.8030406-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-23 9:32 ` Pavel Pisa
[not found] ` <201109231132.49976.pisa-/N2ztlQkxE7Ub/6JBqosbQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-23 15:50 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2011-09-24 7:22 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
[not found] ` <4E7D8537.8010302-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-27 17:32 ` Oliver Hartkopp
[not found] ` <4E8208B5.4050907-fJ+pQTUTwRTk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-27 20:04 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2011-09-24 7:44 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2011-09-27 20:05 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2011-09-29 6:14 ` Kurt Van Dijck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E7B61C8.8020506@hartkopp.net \
--to=socketcan-fj+pqtutwrtk1umjsbkqmq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).