* Re: [PATCH] tcp: properly release md5sig_pool references
2011-09-26 6:26 ` Eric Dumazet
@ 2011-09-26 8:11 ` Yan, Zheng
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yan, Zheng @ 2011-09-26 8:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Dumazet, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
On 09/26/2011 02:26 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le lundi 26 septembre 2011 à 10:35 +0800, Yan, Zheng a écrit :
>> tcp_v4_md5_do_add() increases use count of md5sig_pool by one for
>> each tcp md5sig peer, so we should call tcp_free_md5sig_pool() for
>> each peer when destroying the socket.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zheng Yan <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
>
> As managing the use count is rather expensive, I think it would be
> better to hold a single reference instead of multiple ones ?
>
>
Here is the new patch, thanks.
---
tcp: properly handle md5sig_pool references
tcp_v4_clear_md5_list() assumes that multiple tcp md5sig peers
only hold one reference to md5sig_pool. but tcp_v4_md5_do_add()
increases use count of md5sig_pool for each peer. This patch
makes tcp_v4_md5_do_add() only increases use count for the first
tcp md5sig peer.
Signed-off-by: Zheng Yan <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
---
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index c34f015..29ecfa9 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -927,18 +927,20 @@ int tcp_v4_md5_do_add(struct sock *sk, __be32 addr,
}
sk_nocaps_add(sk, NETIF_F_GSO_MASK);
}
- if (tcp_alloc_md5sig_pool(sk) == NULL) {
+
+ md5sig = tp->md5sig_info;
+ if (md5sig->entries4 == 0 && tcp_alloc_md5sig_pool(sk) == NULL) {
kfree(newkey);
return -ENOMEM;
}
- md5sig = tp->md5sig_info;
if (md5sig->alloced4 == md5sig->entries4) {
keys = kmalloc((sizeof(*keys) *
(md5sig->entries4 + 1)), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!keys) {
kfree(newkey);
- tcp_free_md5sig_pool();
+ if (md5sig->entries4 == 0)
+ tcp_free_md5sig_pool();
return -ENOMEM;
}
@@ -982,6 +984,7 @@ int tcp_v4_md5_do_del(struct sock *sk, __be32 addr)
kfree(tp->md5sig_info->keys4);
tp->md5sig_info->keys4 = NULL;
tp->md5sig_info->alloced4 = 0;
+ tcp_free_md5sig_pool();
} else if (tp->md5sig_info->entries4 != i) {
/* Need to do some manipulation */
memmove(&tp->md5sig_info->keys4[i],
@@ -989,7 +992,6 @@ int tcp_v4_md5_do_del(struct sock *sk, __be32 addr)
(tp->md5sig_info->entries4 - i) *
sizeof(struct tcp4_md5sig_key));
}
- tcp_free_md5sig_pool();
return 0;
}
}
diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
index 3c9fa61..20ac0fc 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
@@ -591,7 +591,8 @@ static int tcp_v6_md5_do_add(struct sock *sk, const struct in6_addr *peer,
}
sk_nocaps_add(sk, NETIF_F_GSO_MASK);
}
- if (tcp_alloc_md5sig_pool(sk) == NULL) {
+ if (tp->md5sig_info->entries6 == 0 &&
+ tcp_alloc_md5sig_pool(sk) == NULL) {
kfree(newkey);
return -ENOMEM;
}
@@ -600,8 +601,9 @@ static int tcp_v6_md5_do_add(struct sock *sk, const struct in6_addr *peer,
(tp->md5sig_info->entries6 + 1)), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!keys) {
- tcp_free_md5sig_pool();
kfree(newkey);
+ if (tp->md5sig_info->entries6 == 0)
+ tcp_free_md5sig_pool();
return -ENOMEM;
}
@@ -647,6 +649,7 @@ static int tcp_v6_md5_do_del(struct sock *sk, const struct in6_addr *peer)
kfree(tp->md5sig_info->keys6);
tp->md5sig_info->keys6 = NULL;
tp->md5sig_info->alloced6 = 0;
+ tcp_free_md5sig_pool();
} else {
/* shrink the database */
if (tp->md5sig_info->entries6 != i)
@@ -655,7 +658,6 @@ static int tcp_v6_md5_do_del(struct sock *sk, const struct in6_addr *peer)
(tp->md5sig_info->entries6 - i)
* sizeof (tp->md5sig_info->keys6[0]));
}
- tcp_free_md5sig_pool();
return 0;
}
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread