netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
To: frog1120@gmail.com
Cc: "J.Hwan.Kim" <j.hwan.kim99@gmail.com>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: intel 82599 multi-port performance
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:04:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E80A2AB.2040206@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E809D59.10103@gmail.com>

On 09/26/2011 08:42 AM, J.Hwan.Kim wrote:
> On 2011년 09월 26일 23:20, Chris Friesen wrote:
>> On 09/26/2011 04:26 AM, J.Hwan Kim wrote:
>>> Hi, everyone
>>>
>>> Now, I'm testing a network card including intel 82599.
>>> In our experiment, with the driver modified with ixgbe and multi-port
>>> enabled,
>>
>> What do you mean by "modified with ixgbe and multi-port enabled"? You
>> shouldn't need to do anything special to use both ports.
>>
>>> rx performance of each port with 10Gbps of 64bytes frame is
>>> a half than when only 1 port is used.
>>
>> Sounds like a cpu limitation. What is your cpu usage? How are your
>> interrupts routed? Are you using multiple rx queues?
>>
>
> Our server is XEON 2.4GHz with 8 cores.
> I'm using 4 RSS queues for each port and distributed it's interrupts 
> to different cores respectively.
> I checked the CPU utilization with TOP, I guess ,it is not cpu 
> imitation problem.

What kind of rates are you seeing on a single port versus multiple 
ports?  There are multiple possibilities in terms of what could be 
limiting your performance.

It sounds like you are using a single card, would that be correct?  If 
you are running close to line rate on both ports this could be causing 
you to saturate the PCIe x8 link.  If you have a second card available 
you may want to try installing that in a secondary Gen2 PCIe slot and 
seeing if you can improve the performance by using 2 PCIe slots instead 
of one.

Also could you include your kernel config?  Certain features such as 
Netfilter and IOMMU can have a significant impact on performance.

Thanks,

Alex

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-26 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-26 10:26 intel 82599 multi-port performance J.Hwan Kim
2011-09-26 14:20 ` Chris Friesen
2011-09-26 15:42   ` J.Hwan.Kim
2011-09-26 16:04     ` Alexander Duyck [this message]
2011-09-26 16:40       ` Chris Friesen
2011-09-26 17:24         ` [E1000-devel] " Ben Greear
2011-09-26 17:46           ` Chris Friesen
2011-09-26 17:57             ` Ben Greear
2011-09-27  0:45       ` J.Hwan Kim
2011-09-27 15:30         ` Martin Millnert
2011-09-27 17:14         ` Alexander Duyck
2011-09-27 22:57           ` Chris Friesen
2011-09-26 18:16     ` Rick Jones
2011-09-27  0:39       ` J.Hwan Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E80A2AB.2040206@intel.com \
    --to=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
    --cc=frog1120@gmail.com \
    --cc=j.hwan.kim99@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).