From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan-fJ+pQTUTwRTk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: SocketCAN Core Mailing List
<socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org>,
Linux Netdev List
<netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] candev: allow SJW user setting for bittiming calculation
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:32:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E8208B5.4050907@hartkopp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E7D8537.8010302-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
On 09/24/11 09:22, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> On 09/23/2011 11:32 AM, Pavel Pisa wrote:
>> On base of above analysis, I think that blindly set SJW
>> on maximum is not good idea. It should be at least limited
>> to 5% of bit time.
(..)
>> SJW is more problematic, but may it be use of 2 or 5%
>> of bittime by default with assurance that zero is
>> replaced by one, would serve to most people pleasure.
(..)
>> But there is still unknown parameter
>> capacity/length of connected wires so there is still
>> something left to user consideration.
>
> Thanks for your detailed explanation. It clearly shows that adjusting
> SJW is non-trivial and nothing a normal CAN user should deal with. When
> adjusting SJW, do you also need to tweek other bit-timing parameters,
> e.g. tq? I mean, would "ip link set can0 type can bitrate x
> sampling-point y sjw z" work for your setup or do you need to use the
> expert mode setting via "ip link set can0 type can tq ..." anyway?
Hello Wolfgang,
i double checked a specification where i got my requirement to influence the
SJW value from. It says (non literally):
"Put the SJW to the highest possible value only reduced by tseg2."
The fact that this requirement might no fit to any CAN setup or may not be in
best academical shape is not my problem. My requirement is to provide an easy
way to move the SJW away from it's default value, which is currently
hard-coded to 1 in the can-dev framework when using it's bittiming calculation
function.
As almost everything is already done (only the provided SJW is not evaluated
in dev.c) this patch is IMO an valid option to support it. If Joe user can
tune the sampling point, why should he not be able to influence the SJW if he
thinks, he knows what he's doing?
Especially as the good working bittiming calculation is not touched in any way
and the default SJW remains 1 (even if '0' is provided as user input).
Regards,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-27 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-22 10:28 [PATCH net-next v2] candev: allow SJW user setting for bittiming calculation Oliver Hartkopp
[not found] ` <4E7B0DE6.9020807-fJ+pQTUTwRTk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-22 13:07 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
[not found] ` <4E7B331F.3070801-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-22 16:26 ` Oliver Hartkopp
[not found] ` <4E7B61C8.8020506-fJ+pQTUTwRTk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-22 18:10 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
[not found] ` <4E7B7A30.4030707-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-22 19:41 ` Oliver Hartkopp
[not found] ` <4E7B8F63.6060108-fJ+pQTUTwRTk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-23 7:24 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
[not found] ` <4E7C3424.8030406-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-23 9:32 ` Pavel Pisa
[not found] ` <201109231132.49976.pisa-/N2ztlQkxE7Ub/6JBqosbQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-23 15:50 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2011-09-24 7:22 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
[not found] ` <4E7D8537.8010302-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-27 17:32 ` Oliver Hartkopp [this message]
[not found] ` <4E8208B5.4050907-fJ+pQTUTwRTk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-27 20:04 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2011-09-24 7:44 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2011-09-27 20:05 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2011-09-29 6:14 ` Kurt Van Dijck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E8208B5.4050907@hartkopp.net \
--to=socketcan-fj+pqtutwrtk1umjsbkqmq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).