From: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
To: Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>
Cc: 'Rick Jones' <rick.jones2@hp.com>,
"'davem@davemloft.net'" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"'netdev@vger.kernel.org'" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Kravkov <dmitry@broadcom.com>,
Eilon Greenstein <eilong@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bnx2x: Disable LRO on FCoE or iSCSI boot device
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:17:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E9898F6.6000302@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C27F8246C663564A84BB7AB34397724266D2018306@IRVEXCHCCR01.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
On 10/14/2011 9:15 AM, Michael Chan wrote:
> Rick Jones wrote:
>
>> On 10/14/2011 08:53 AM, Michael Chan wrote:
>>> Rick Jones wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is this perhaps saying that a bnx2x-driven device being used for
>>>> FCoE or iSCSI boot must not permit *any* run-time configuration
>>>> change which leads to a NIC reset?
>>>>
>>>
>>> That is right. Unless you have a multipath configuration with
>> multiple
>>> ports, then you can reset one port at a time.
>>
>> So, should there also be a "cnic_boot_device" check in many of the
>> "capital letter" ethtool paths?
>>
>
> If the user is doing ethtool configuration changes or device shutdown,
> it is more obvious what the consequence will be. The user may also be
> careful to do it on a multipath setup.
>
> The reset caused by the auto turn-off of LRO when you enable
> ip_forward or bridging will not be obvious to the user. In addition,
> all devices with LRO turned on will be reset at the same time so even
> multipath will not survive.
>
But after the reset the device should login and SCSI layer should
handle retries. So I don't see why this is a problem. Why do we
need to handle this any different from any other link events?
.John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-14 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-14 3:38 [PATCH net-next] bnx2x: Disable LRO on FCoE or iSCSI boot device Michael Chan
2011-10-14 15:31 ` Rick Jones
2011-10-14 15:53 ` Michael Chan
2011-10-14 16:06 ` Rick Jones
2011-10-14 16:15 ` Michael Chan
2011-10-14 20:17 ` John Fastabend [this message]
2011-10-14 20:59 ` Michael Chan
2011-10-19 20:06 ` David Miller
2011-10-19 20:12 ` Michael Chan
2011-10-19 20:47 ` David Miller
2011-10-19 20:53 ` John Fastabend
2011-10-19 21:03 ` David Miller
2011-10-27 23:30 ` Michael Chan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-02-13 11:20 Vasily Averin
2012-02-13 19:09 ` Michael Chan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E9898F6.6000302@intel.com \
--to=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dmitry@broadcom.com \
--cc=eilong@broadcom.com \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).