From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Yan, Zheng" Subject: [PATCH] fib_rules: fix unresolved_rules counting Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:20:28 +0800 Message-ID: <4E9CD45C.9050608@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "davem@davemloft.net" Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:42793 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752150Ab1JRBUa (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:20:30 -0400 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: we should decrease ops->unresolved_rules when deleting a unresolved rule. Signed-off-by: Zheng Yan --- diff --git a/net/core/fib_rules.c b/net/core/fib_rules.c index 3231b46..27071ee 100644 --- a/net/core/fib_rules.c +++ b/net/core/fib_rules.c @@ -475,8 +475,11 @@ static int fib_nl_delrule(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr* nlh, void *arg) list_del_rcu(&rule->list); - if (rule->action == FR_ACT_GOTO) + if (rule->action == FR_ACT_GOTO) { ops->nr_goto_rules--; + if (rtnl_dereference(rule->ctarget) == NULL) + ops->unresolved_rules--; + } /* * Check if this rule is a target to any of them. If so,