From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Simon Chen <simonchennj@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: under-performing bonded interfaces
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:07:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EC45052.10101@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANj2EbfrtbysEbj+gMa+fOhWo0EWjBXVyGkw8WyiPAV9nPduuQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/16/2011 04:05 PM, Simon Chen wrote:
> If used independently, I can get around 9.8Gbps.
On each of them concurrently, or just one at a time?
> [ 11.572857] ixgbe 0000:03:00.0: Multiqueue Enabled: Rx Queue count
> = 24, Tx Queue count = 24
> [ 11.572861] ixgbe 0000:03:00.0: (PCI Express:5.0Gb/s:Width x4)
> e8:9a:8f:23:42:1a
> [ 11.572943] ixgbe 0000:03:00.0: MAC: 2, PHY: 8, SFP+: 3, PBA No: FFFFFF-0FF
> [ 11.572944] ixgbe 0000:03:00.0: PCI-Express bandwidth available for
> this card is not sufficient for optimal performance.
> [ 11.572946] ixgbe 0000:03:00.0: For optimal performance a x8
> PCI-Express slot is required.
Looks to me like it may be hardware related unless you are certain you
can get both NICs running at high-speed independently of any bonding
code...
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-17 0:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-16 23:44 under-performing bonded interfaces Simon Chen
2011-11-17 0:01 ` Ben Greear
2011-11-17 0:05 ` Simon Chen
2011-11-17 0:07 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2011-11-17 0:57 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-11-17 1:38 ` Simon Chen
2011-11-17 1:45 ` Simon Chen
2011-11-17 1:45 ` Rick Jones
2011-11-17 2:51 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-12-22 1:26 ` Simon Chen
2011-12-22 1:36 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-12-22 3:31 ` Ben Greear
2011-12-22 2:28 ` Simon Chen
2011-12-22 5:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-23 15:03 ` Simon Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EC45052.10101@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simonchennj@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).