From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: Simon Chen <simonchennj@gmail.com>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>,
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: under-performing bonded interfaces
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:45:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EC4673E.4060605@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANj2Ebdd89=Fk6i4e4Txsb3ANuzz-x4t+tT6CAnWDNZe0zvx9g@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/16/2011 05:38 PM, Simon Chen wrote:
> Thanks, Ben. That's good discovery...
>
> Are you saying that both 10G NICs are on the same PCIe x4 slot, so
> that they're subject to the 12G throughput bottleneck?
>
> I'm gonna verify this with the hardware vendor...
Look at the PCI addresses - they are:
0000:03:00.0
0000:03:00.1
The numbers after the "dot" are PCI function numbers, meaning that both
*ports* of the dual-port NIC are in the same PCIe slot, in this case a
x4 slot.
more generally, the format is:
DDDD:BB:SS.F
D == DOMAIN; B == BUS; S == SLOT; F == FUNCTION. If domain, bus and
slot are the same, but functions differ, the "devices" are in the same slot.
rick jones
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-17 1:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-16 23:44 under-performing bonded interfaces Simon Chen
2011-11-17 0:01 ` Ben Greear
2011-11-17 0:05 ` Simon Chen
2011-11-17 0:07 ` Ben Greear
2011-11-17 0:57 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-11-17 1:38 ` Simon Chen
2011-11-17 1:45 ` Simon Chen
2011-11-17 1:45 ` Rick Jones [this message]
2011-11-17 2:51 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-12-22 1:26 ` Simon Chen
2011-12-22 1:36 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-12-22 3:31 ` Ben Greear
2011-12-22 2:28 ` Simon Chen
2011-12-22 5:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-23 15:03 ` Simon Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EC4673E.4060605@hp.com \
--to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simonchennj@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).