From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
To: Felipe Dias <felipediassss@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: skb->tstamp == 0.00000 ?
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 18:15:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EC935A2.6020200@hartkopp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJX4=r1nz4Wq00tmJKUsJNLb41Bh4=-V1ixLcS05mXm0tpek9g@mail.gmail.com>
On 19.11.2011 22:18, Felipe Dias wrote:
> Hi..
>
> Please let me know if this isnt right list to this kind of question.
>
> I'm registering a new protocol handler with dev_add_pack. I would like
> to know only the difference between timestamp on skb->tstamp and the
> time of reception by my module.
Hello Felipe,
tstamp is a ktime_t type, which is a timestamp in nanosecs
http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.1.1/include/linux/ktime.h#L28
The value in the skbuff
http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.1.1/include/linux/skbuff.h#L347
is usually set at PDU reception time -> see netif_rx().
http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.1.1/net/core/dev.c#L2879
where net_timestamp_check(skb) is executed which usually sets the timestamp
when timestamping is activated.
So when your netdevice creates a proper skbuff (e.g. using skb_alloc) the
timestamp is set to zero and therefore set to the receive time in
net_timestamp_check().
>
> So I do:
> ----
> struct timeval time_skb, time_module;
> do_gettimeofday(&time_module):
> skb_get_timestamp(skb, &time_skb);
> ---
>
> And time_skb.tv_sec and time_skb.tv_usec are equal to 0;
>
> I'm doing some wrong ?
Hm, i don't see, why you convert ktime_t to timeval.
You better work on skb->tstamp with the ktime functions directly, e.g. with
skb_get_ktime().
I hope this gives you a bit more insight in skb->tstamp - even if i don't know
your problem in detail %-)
Regards,
Oliver
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-20 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-19 21:18 skb->tstamp == 0.00000 ? Felipe Dias
2011-11-20 17:15 ` Oliver Hartkopp [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EC935A2.6020200@hartkopp.net \
--to=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
--cc=felipediassss@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).