From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-next 2011-11-28 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:58:06 +0200 Message-ID: <4ED4C8CE.8030408@qca.qualcomm.com> References: <20111128200221.GD2681@tuxdriver.com> <20111128.195516.37800643865997337.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , To: David Miller Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20111128.195516.37800643865997337.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 11/29/2011 02:55 AM, David Miller wrote: > Pulled, but please push back on the ath6kl guys, they seem to have > this disease where they add tons of debugfs files Sorry about that. I was under impression that there are no strict rules for debugfs files and drivers can add them without too much worries, but it seems I was wrong. > for controlling things like QoS from userspace instead of creating > and using generic configuration machanisms via netlink or similar > that any other driver could support too. Adding a generic QoS interface would take some time to implement and I doubt that we (=ath6kl team) can do that anytime soon as our first challange has been to get ath6kl working properly with cfg80211. That's why we ended up having a debugfs interface for qos as our first step. Kalle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html