From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
To: "Lothar Waßmann" <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] flexcan: Acknowledge all interrupt sources in the IRQ handler
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 21:10:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EE3BCB4.7060401@grandegger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EE21C96.5010604@grandegger.com>
On 12/09/2011 03:35 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> On 12/09/2011 02:59 PM, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Marc Kleine-Budde writes:
>>> On 12/09/2011 02:47 PM, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
>>>> Otherwise the handler will get stuck in an endless IRQ loop when an
>>>> interrupt condition occurs that is not being acked (e.g. TWRN)
>>>
>>> On which CPU do you have this problem?
>>>
>> on i.MX28.
>
> Yes, it is definitely needed on i.MX28 and I already have it in my
> series. See:
>
> https://gitorious.org/~wgrandegger/linux-can/wg-linux-can-next/commit/8ad94fa0dd7f7728824fa8fd4479390ac3f189c7
>
> BTW: at similar patch was already sent by Reuben Dowle.
>
>>> Seems that mx25/35 behave a bit different than mx28. But I had no time
>>> to dig into this, yet. BTW Wolfgang is just reworking error handling,
>>> can you please test his patches he recently posted on linux-can.
>>>
>> The ESR of i.MX25 is completely identical to the i.MX28.
>> You should be able to reproduce the problem when trying to send a
>> message to a CAN interface with the transceiver disabled.
>> You will get a BIT0_ERR and the TWRN bit will be asserted and never
>> cleared leading to an endless interrupt loop.
>
> If you are right, the code was never working on i.MX25/35... which I doubt.
I know remember that the old code was working on a MX35PDK board.
Actually I did the porting some time ago. That means that we have to
deal with two variants of the Flexcan controller, unfortunately:
mx25/35: State changes *and* bus errors are both signalled via ESR ERR
bit. The TWRN, RWRN and BOFF bits seem not to be used. Therefore
bus error reporting cannot be enabled/disabled individually.
mx28/mx53?: Bus error are signalled via ESR ERR bit and state changes
via TWRN, RWRN and BOFF bit. Therefore bus error reporting
*can* be enabled/disabled individually as implemented by this
patch:
https://gitorious.org/~wgrandegger/linux-can/wg-linux-can-next/commit/f0829d269a451c8abb99435d5a1a63cb18566668
I will try to get a MX35PDK board for further evaluation and development.
Wolfgang.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-10 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-09 13:47 [PATCH] flexcan: Acknowledge all interrupt sources in the IRQ handler Lothar Waßmann
2011-12-09 13:52 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2011-12-09 13:59 ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-12-09 14:35 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2011-12-10 20:10 ` Wolfgang Grandegger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EE3BCB4.7060401@grandegger.com \
--to=wg@grandegger.com \
--cc=LW@KARO-electronics.de \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).