From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Arend van Spriel" Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the tree Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:47:09 +0100 Message-ID: <4EF1B92D.9040405@broadcom.com> References: <20111221124931.992e4e4265f2c3cd1d2e75b4@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "John W. Linville" , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Rusty Russell" , "David Miller" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" To: "Stephen Rothwell" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20111221124931.992e4e4265f2c3cd1d2e75b4@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 12/21/2011 02:49 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi John, > > Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-next tree got a conflict in > drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/dhd_linux.c between commit > 3db1cd5c05f3 ("net: fix assignment of 0/1 to bool variables") from the > tree and commit 3fb1d8d2dad3 ("brcm80211: fmac: move driver up status to > struct brcmf_bus") from the wireless-next tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. > Thanks, Stephen I noticed Rusty's patch and the use of 0/1 for bool in our tree. Was going to fix that, but this fix looks fine. Gr. AvS