From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Niccol=F2_Belli?= Subject: Re: [Announce] LARTC wiki available Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:13:38 +0100 Message-ID: <4EFC9FC2.1090503@linuxsystems.it> References: <4EFB3B2B.7060200@linuxsystems.it> <20111229002717.GB3548@hell> <4EFC34E5.4040202@linuxsystems.it> <20111229161919.GA2948@hell> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: "netfilter@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Networking Developer Mailing List To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail.linuxsystems.it ([2.119.245.41]:50488 "EHLO mail.linuxsystems.it" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752748Ab1L2RNh (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Dec 2011 12:13:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20111229161919.GA2948@hell> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Il 29/12/2011 17:19, Hagen Paul Pfeifer ha scritto: > But I don't like the idea to outhouse the existing wiki. Why two wiki= s? Because if you need an invite to edit something then it isn't a wiki=20 anymore, for example. > What happened with the wiki server if you leave the university? This isn't a problem, because relocating would be as simple as doing a=20 database dump. Releasing dumps publicly wouldn't be a problem too. Also= ,=20 there is no reason to keep using my servers when better alternatives=20 arise. I created the wiki in a dedicated server because I didn't find=20 viable alternatives (unlike for the mailing list) and considering the=20 few feedbacks I received hopefully doing something tangible would creat= e=20 more interest: I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one who thinks there=20 isn't enough documentation for the *end user*. > So maybe the user > restriction on linuxfoundation.org should be changed? Yes, IMHO. > https://www.wiki.kernel.org/. It seems a wiki for a kernel hacker, not for the end user. P.S. =46eedbacks are welcome, if there is no interest at all maybe we should= =20 just discard the idea after all. Thanks, Niccol=F2