From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: RE: [PATCH] x86: fix and improve cmpxchg_double{,_local}() Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 10:54:22 +0000 Message-ID: <4F043DEE020000780006A575@nat28.tlf.novell.com> References: <1325611899.2320.111.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: , , "Christoph Lameter" , , "netdev" , To: "David Laight" , "Eric Dumazet" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org >>> On 04.01.12 at 11:36, "David Laight" wrote: >> BTW atomic64_set() asm() contraints are wrong : >> >> static inline void atomic64_set(atomic64_t *v, long long i) >> { >> unsigned high = (unsigned)(i >> 32); >> unsigned low = (unsigned)i; >> asm volatile(ATOMIC64_ALTERNATIVE(set) >> : "+b" (low), "+c" (high) >> : "S" (v) >> : "eax", "edx", "memory" >> ); >> } >> >> >> ebx/ecx registers are not modified by cmpxchg8b (or the >> atomic64_set_386 emulation). Only eax/edx can be modified. Same would be true for atomic64_xchg() and the use of "+c" (v) in subsequent functions (whether unnecessarily strict or too lax varies). > Isn't it also possible to constrain the "memory" > constraint to only apply to '*v' not all of memory? > I can't remember the syntax off hand though... Absolutely - "=m" (v->counter) would be the right way to specify this. Jan