From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stanislav Kinsbursky Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] SUNRPC: ip map cache per network namespace cleanup Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:10:08 +0400 Message-ID: <4F184E70.5070902@parallels.com> References: <20120119144517.9957.59143.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> <20120119144931.9957.78601.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> <20120119163722.GE527@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: "Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com" , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" , Pavel Emelianov , "neilb@suse.de" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , James Bottomley , "davem@davemloft.net" , "devel@openvz.org" To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120119163722.GE527@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org 19.01.2012 20:37, J. Bruce Fields =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 06:49:31PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote: >> This patch converts ip_map_cache per network namespace implemenetati= on to the >> same view, as other caches done in the series. >> Besides generalization, code becomes shorter with this patch. > > Again, isnt' it ip_map_cache, and not one of the dynamically created > cache details, that's being passed to the lookup routines? > > I may just be confused.... > Nope. ip_map_cache was made per network namespace a long time ago. But it was done in other way: no static templates - just allocation and= =20 initialization. But static template looks clearer to me. So I've used this approach for= other=20 caches. And decided to update ip_map_cache management in the same way. --=20 Best regards, Stanislav Kinsbursky