From: Stephen Clark <sclark46@earthlink.net>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NAT question
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:28:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F203BC7.6090708@earthlink.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1327510327.2425.75.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC>
On 01/25/2012 11:52 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mercredi 25 janvier 2012 à 10:54 -0500, Stephen Clark a écrit :
>
>> Can iptables do a network to network nat without having to write out a
>> bunch of nat rules.
>> In other words translate 192.168.198.0/24 to 172.16.10.0/24 without
>> having to write out
>> 256 rules.
>>
>> Also can iptables handle 1000 nat rules like above if they have to be
>> written out on
>> a 1.66ghz intel dual core atom with 1gb of mem.
>>
>> I know this isn't appropriate question for devel list but I didn't find
>> anything googling.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
> If you are forced to use 256 rules, you could split them into 16 tables
> of 16 rules and do a hash split.
>
> Since these rules are run only for new connections, it might be OK
> performance wise, depending on rate of connection establishment.
>
> If not, you can try NETMAP :)
>
> # iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.198.0/24 -j NETMAP --to 172.16.10.0/24
>
> # iptables -t nat -nvL POSTROUTING
> Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
> pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
> 0 0 NETMAP all -- * * 192.168.198.0/24 0.0.0.0/0 172.16.10.0/24
>
>
Thanks Eric,
I assume I need an additional rule like this to translate in the other
direction?
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 172.16.10.0/24 -j NETMAP --to
198.168.198.0/24
iptables -t nat -nvL POSTROUTING
Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
destination
15 2535 NETMAP all -- * * 192.168.198.0/24
0.0.0.0/0 172.16.10.0/24
0 0 NETMAP all -- * * 172.16.10.0/24
0.0.0.0/0 198.168.198.0/24
Also now that I am clued to NETMAP I found this example:
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -s 192.168.1.0/24 -j NETMAP --to
10.5.6.0/24
using mangle and PREROUTING - does it matter?
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety,
deserve neither liberty nor safety." (Ben Franklin)
"The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty
decreases." (Thomas Jefferson)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-25 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-25 15:54 NAT question Stephen Clark
2012-01-25 16:47 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2012-01-25 16:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-25 17:28 ` Stephen Clark [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F203BC7.6090708@earthlink.net \
--to=sclark46@earthlink.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).