From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"jeremy@goop.org" <jeremy@goop.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-netfront: correct MAX_TX_TARGET calculation.
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:27:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F2BD2CC.4050906@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1327660589.2585.14.camel@leeni.uk.xensource.com>
On 01/27/12 11:36, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 18:19 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 05:23:23PM +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
>>
>> Can you give some more details please? What is the impact of
>> not having this? Should it be backported to stable?
>>
>
> I think it will not cause crash, only the scratch space size is
> affected, thus impacting tx batching a bit.
>
> As the tx structure is bigger than rx structure. I think scratch space
> size is likely to shrink after correction.
It also seems to affect the netfront_tx_slot_available() function,
making it stricter (likely). Before the patch, the function may have
reported available slots when there were none, causing spurious(?) queue
wakeups in xennet_maybe_wake_tx(), and not stopping the queue in
xennet_start_xmit() when it should have(?).
It seems there are no further uses of TX_MAX_TARGET, and for bounds
checking NET_TX_RING_SIZE was used (which was always correct). So I
guess the typo may have caused some performance degradation.
I can't either prove or disprove a DoS-like busy loop in the pre-patch form.
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-03 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-26 17:23 [PATCH] xen-netfront: correct MAX_TX_TARGET calculation Wei Liu
2012-01-26 18:19 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-01-27 10:36 ` Wei Liu
2012-02-03 12:27 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2012-02-03 12:59 ` [Xen-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2012-02-03 13:26 ` Jan Beulich
2012-02-03 13:39 ` Laszlo Ersek
2012-01-26 18:48 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F2BD2CC.4050906@redhat.com \
--to=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).