From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: "Michał Mirosław" <mirqus@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] send-crc: Add framework to allow sending packets with customized CRC.
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:06:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F31BC68.9000502@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHXqBFKbv13jL_RqbOTZp6P-TOO7iQ1211SXmMso_3LK27LkPw@mail.gmail.com>
On 02/07/2012 03:59 PM, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> W dniu 7 lutego 2012 21:43 użytkownik Ben Greear
> <greearb@candelatech.com> napisał:
>> On 02/07/2012 12:33 PM, Michał Mirosław wrote:
>>>
>>> 2012/2/7<greearb@candelatech.com>:
>>>>
>>>> From: Ben Greear<greearb@candelatech.com>
>>>>
>>>> This is useful for testing RX handling of frames with bad
>>>> CRCs.
>>>>
>>>> Requires driver support to actually put the packet on the
>>>> wire properly.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> I like this idea. I think that this is not a feature to have in
>>> dev->features to toggle, though. Driver either supports this or not,
>>> so it's better to put it in dev->priv_flags instead. Disabling of FCS
>>> inserting is a per-packet option in the drivers, isn't it?
>>>
>>> For one problem with toggling: if you create a socket using it and
>>> later turn off the feature, the socket will still send skbs with FCS
>>> appended.
>> For the priv-flags, is there a way to query that from user-space to
>> see if the NIC supports it?
>>
>> The pkt-socket xmit logic will throw away pkts if the NIC doesn't
>> have the feature enabled, but a few already queued might get
>> through with extra CRC appended.
>>
>> So, I'm fine with your suggestion, as long as there is some way to
>> query whether the NIC supports this feature or not...
>
> There's a way, as you implemented -EINVAL when trying to send via
> unsupporting device. :-) Would be even better if setting SO_NO_FCS
> would fail at setsockopt() time.
Using -EINVAL for this purpose is lame even by my low standards :)
And, you don't necessarily know what device you are bound to
at setsockopt time, so I don't think I can add restrictions
there.
> priv_flags are not exposed to userspace. It should be easy to export
> them using ETHTOOL_GFEATURES as non-changeable features, if that's
> useful.
I'll poke around and see what I can figure out.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-08 0:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-07 19:49 [PATCH 1/5] send-crc: Add framework to allow sending packets with customized CRC greearb
2012-02-07 19:49 ` [PATCH 2/5] e100: Support sending custom Ethernet CRC greearb
2012-02-07 19:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] e1000e: " greearb
2012-02-07 20:33 ` [PATCH 1/5] send-crc: Add framework to allow sending packets with customized CRC Michał Mirosław
2012-02-07 20:43 ` Ben Greear
2012-02-07 23:59 ` Michał Mirosław
2012-02-08 0:06 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2012-02-08 8:02 ` Jeff Kirsher
2012-02-08 15:55 ` Ben Greear
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F31BC68.9000502@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=mirqus@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).