From: Nick Jones <nick.jones@network-box.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: perform inetpeer binding at dst creation, with readonly option
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 00:10:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F58D9F5.1080902@network-box.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120306.160528.1272258218296495399.davem@davemloft.net>
On 07/03/2012 5:05 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Nick Jones <nick.jones@network-box.com>
> Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 23:49:31 +0800
>
>> A neighbour advertises itself as obsolete and at a later time, the host
>> sends solicitations to the neighbours direct address. The NS icmp6
>> packets have hoplimit explicitly set to 255.
>>
>> The neighbour re-advertises itself. All subsequent packets sent to the
>> neighbour address will now have hoplimit stuck at 255 because the setup
>> of the NS packet wrote 255 to the cached metrics of the inetpeer that
>> the neighbour address' ip6_dst was bound to. If the neighbour was a
>> router, a RA that attempts to update the hoplimit for the route will
>> have no effect because of the way ip6_dst_hoplimit works.
>>
>> This patch adds an rt6_init_metrics method that is called shortly after
>> a call to ip6_dst_alloc, it performs the inetpeer binding at that time.
>>
>> It allows the caller to indicate whether they want the new ip6_dst
>> metrics, and thus the inetpeer metrics, to be writable. icmp6_dst_alloc
>> will now no longer permanently alter the peer metrics.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nick Jones <nick.jones@network-box.com>
>
> So we essentially have two views of the same inetpeer.
>
> I would say that the real fix for this is to just use kmalloc'd
> metrics for these special icmp6 dsts and leave the rest of the
> code alone.
Sure, I'm testing a patch that follows this suggestion and will submit it
soon.
However, seeing a kmalloc done for such a transient, sparse structure didn't
sit so well in the stomach. If we can be sure that the metrics of a dst for
an icmp6 packet won't be written to, we could use the static const
ip6_template_metrics array defined in route.c:~205, it has RTAX_HOPLIMIT
fixed at 255, and using it avoids a kmalloc.
I'll produce another patch for this strategy if you think this is a better idea.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-08 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-06 15:49 [PATCH net-next] ipv6: perform inetpeer binding at dst creation, with readonly option Nick Jones
2012-03-06 21:05 ` David Miller
2012-03-08 16:10 ` Nick Jones [this message]
2012-03-08 21:40 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F58D9F5.1080902@network-box.com \
--to=nick.jones@network-box.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).