From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Fastabend Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v0 0/5] Series short description Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 19:49:50 -0700 Message-ID: <4F67F04E.8060800@intel.com> References: <20120319.183808.976759898435189612.davem@davemloft.net> <20120319155537.79d5802c@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <4F67CED4.4000700@intel.com> <20120319.203541.1126968121556911783.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jhs@mojatatu.com, bhutchings@solarflare.com, roprabhu@cisco.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com, chrisw@redhat.com, gregory.v.rose@intel.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, sri@us.ibm.com, chealy@imsco-us.com To: David Miller , shemminger@vyatta.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120319.203541.1126968121556911783.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 3/19/2012 5:35 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: John Fastabend > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:27:00 -0700 > >> Dave, its probably fine to push this to 3.5 then. > > Fair enough. Stephen, please let me know if you see any issues though because without these we have no way to forward packets correctly in the embedded switch. So we can't really use SR-IOV and virtual interfaces together correctly. And the macvlan device in passthru mode is putting the device in promiscuous mode which isn't great either. .John