From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: Thomas Lendacky <tahm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Shirley Ma <mashirle@us.ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] NUMA aware scheduling per cpu vhost thread
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:21:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F6CE940.6010209@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2657507.ZkkGW14H3c@tomlt1.ibmoffice.com>
>
> Yeah, it becomes a question of time. I run each test 3 times and
> average the results, so to run the full suite takes a long time.
I've found the "walk up the instance count with the interim results
emitted" allows me quicker overall run time than launching all the
netperfs at once with a long run time to kludge around skew. Well
modulo the time it takes to get them all launched. But for the smallish
stuff it is rather faster than the 15 minutes a data point I'd get with
the (ab)use of the confidence intervals mechanism in runemomniagg2.sh .
It also avoids the "run one wait for it to finish, run two, wait for
them to finish, run four, wait for them to finish" bit. Walking-up the
instance count leaving the previous instances going does mean that the
"end of test" information is full of skew, but a great deal of that
end-of-test information is invariant anyway.
happy benchmarking,
rick jones
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-23 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-22 23:48 [RFC PATCH 1/1] NUMA aware scheduling per cpu vhost thread Shirley Ma
2012-03-23 0:16 ` Shirley Ma
2012-03-23 18:32 ` Thomas Lendacky
2012-03-23 19:00 ` Rick Jones
2012-03-23 21:10 ` Thomas Lendacky
2012-03-23 21:21 ` Rick Jones [this message]
2012-03-23 23:45 ` David Ahern
2012-03-27 14:34 ` Thomas Lendacky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F6CE940.6010209@hp.com \
--to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mashirle@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tahm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).