From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Fastabend Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v1 7/7] macvlan: add FDB bridge ops and new macvlan mode Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:26:21 -0700 Message-ID: <4F84511D.7060902@intel.com> References: <20120409215419.3288.50790.stgit@jf-dev1-dcblab> <20120409220053.3288.40867.stgit@jf-dev1-dcblab> <20120410080916.GB26540@redhat.com> <4F843544.8060209@intel.com> <20120410134321.GB18899@redhat.com> <4F8442F6.5070707@intel.com> <20120410143500.GD19556@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: roprabhu@cisco.com, stephen.hemminger@vyatta.com, davem@davemloft.net, hadi@cyberus.ca, bhutchings@solarflare.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, gregory.v.rose@intel.com, krkumar2@in.ibm.com, sri@us.ibm.com To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:5045 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753745Ab2DJP0W (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:26:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120410143500.GD19556@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 4/10/2012 7:35 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 07:25:58AM -0700, John Fastabend wrote: >>> Hmm okay, but this would mean we should convert >>> MACVLAN_MODE_PASSTHRU_NOPROMISC to something >>> that can combined with all modes. E.g. >>> MACVLAN_MODE_BRIDGE | MACVLAN_MODE_FLAG_XXXXX >>> >>> and document that it does not promise to flood >>> multicast. >>> >> >> How about changing MACVLAN_MODE_PASSTHRU_NOPROMISC -> MACVLAN_MODE_NOPORMISC >> for this patch. Then a follow on series can rework bridge >> and VEPA to use it as well. > > Right. We probably need a better name if it's going to > affect other things besides promisc though. > how about MACVLAN_MODE_FDBFLAG?