From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@computer.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: filter: Just In Time compiler for sparc
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:39:02 +0200
Message-ID: <4F8EEE26.7040501@computer.org>
References: <20120416.225823.1395194623649559124.davem@davemloft.net> <4F8DA21E.9020809@computer.org> <20120417.154222.453472384916762847.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <sparclinux-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120417.154222.453472384916762847.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: sparclinux-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

David Miller wrote:
> From: Jan Ceuleers<jan.ceuleers@computer.org>
> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 19:02:22 +0200
>
>> There is inconsistent spacing in multiple places; a few examples shown
>> above.
>
> You've never written sparc assembler before, obviously.
>
> The extra space after the tabs is intentional, and indicates
> a branch delay slot instruction.

Indeed I haven't. I've written assembly for many processors, both RISC 
and CISC, but not SPARC. And I've never come across this convention, so 
thanks for educating and indulging me.

Jan