From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>,
"Neal Cardwell" <ncardwell@google.com>,
"David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Tom Herbert" <therbert@google.com>,
"Maciej Żenczykowski" <maze@google.com>,
"Yuchung Cheng" <ycheng@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] tcp: avoid expensive pskb_expand_head() calls
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:05:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F9053FD.4060509@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334858436.2395.212.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
>> That or bare ACKs have to be excluded from the overhead checks somehow I
>> guess, or there be more aggressive copying into smaller buffers.
>>
>
> Nope, we need a limit or risk OOM if a malicious peer send ACK flood ;)
Well, there is that...
>
> To be clear, if I change the tcp_rmem[1] from 87380 to big value, I no
> longer have ACK drops, but still poor performance, I am still
> investigating.
What happens if you set net.core.[rw]mem_max to 4 MB and then use
something like -s 1M -S 1M in netperf?
netperf -t TCP_STREAM -H <remote> -- -s 1M -S 1M -m 64K
(or -m 16K if you want to keep the send size the same as your previous
tests...)
rick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-19 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-17 9:06 [BUG] ixgbe: something wrong with queue selection ? Eric Dumazet
2012-04-17 9:16 ` Jeff Kirsher
2012-04-17 16:01 ` Alexander Duyck
2012-04-17 16:38 ` John Fastabend
2012-04-17 17:07 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-04-17 16:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-04-17 21:38 ` TSO not 10G friendly if peer is close enough Eric Dumazet
2012-04-17 21:47 ` David Miller
2012-04-18 3:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-04-18 15:49 ` [PATCH net-next] tcp: avoid expensive pskb_expand_head() calls Eric Dumazet
[not found] ` <4F8EF317.10504@hp.com>
2012-04-18 17:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-04-18 17:30 ` Rick Jones
2012-04-18 17:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-04-18 18:40 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-04-18 19:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-04-18 19:51 ` [PATCH v2 " Eric Dumazet
2012-04-19 11:10 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2012-04-19 11:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-04-19 11:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-04-19 11:57 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2012-04-19 12:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-04-20 12:27 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2012-04-19 13:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-04-19 13:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-04-19 14:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-04-19 17:20 ` Rick Jones
2012-04-19 17:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-04-19 17:48 ` Rick Jones
2012-04-19 18:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-04-19 18:05 ` Rick Jones [this message]
2012-04-18 19:41 ` [PATCH " Vijay Subramanian
2012-04-18 19:49 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F9053FD.4060509@hp.com \
--to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi \
--cc=maze@google.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
--cc=ycheng@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).