netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	e1000-devel list <e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: e1000e tx queue timeout in 3.3.0 (bisected to BQL support for e1000e)
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:56:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F91DB7B.7060601@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+mtBx-K6-O3ea34kmn4LXtx73FqCHF16w7pBSq1fHNN+-DxCA@mail.gmail.com>

On 04/20/2012 02:21 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> Thanks John for pointers to those.  Ben, are you running a kernel with
> these patches?

I just tested this on my e1000e and igb machine.  With these patches,
I can no longer reproduce the problem.

So, please make sure those are queued up for 3.3 stable!

Thanks,
Ben

>
> Tom
>
>>
>> Tom, did you see these two patches? Maybe this is resolved by
>> the second patch.
>>
>> We needed these to fixup ixgbe and igb (i didn't test e1000e)
>> looks like we might want to push these at stable. I don't
>> believe they are in 3.3.
>>
>> commit b37c0fbe3f6dfba1f8ad2aed47fb40578a254635
>> Author: Alexander Duyck<alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
>> Date:   Tue Feb 7 02:29:06 2012 +0000
>>
>>     net: Add memory barriers to prevent possible race in byte queue limits
>>
>>     This change adds a memory barrier to the byte queue limit code to address a
>>     possible race as has been seen in the past with the
>>     netif_stop_queue/netif_wake_queue logic.
>>
>>     Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck<alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
>>     Tested-by: Stephen Ko<stephen.s.ko@intel.com>
>>     Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher<jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
>>
>>
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b37c0fbe3f6dfba1f8ad2aed47fb40578a254635
>>
>>
>> commit 5c4903549c05bbb373479e0ce2992573c120654a
>> Author: Alexander Duyck<alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
>> Date:   Tue Feb 7 02:29:01 2012 +0000
>>
>>     net: Fix issue with netdev_tx_reset_queue not resetting queue from XOFF state
>>
>>     We are seeing dev_watchdog hangs on several drivers.  I suspect this is due
>>     to the __QUEUE_STATE_STACK_XOFF bit being set prior to a reset for link
>>     change, and then not being cleared by netdev_tx_reset_queue.  This change
>>     corrects that.
>>
>>     In addition we were seeing dev_watchdog hangs on igb after running the
>>     ethtool tests.  We found this to be due to the fact that the ethtool test
>>     runs the same logic as ndo_start_xmit, but we were never clearing the XOFF
>>     flag since the loopback test in ethtool does not do byte queue accounting.
>>
>>     Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck<alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
>>     Tested-by: Stephen Ko<stephen.s.ko@intel.com>
>>     Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher<jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
>>
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5c4903549c05bbb373479e0ce2992573c120654a
>>
>>


-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel&#174; Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-04-20 21:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-19 23:27 e1000e tx queue timeout in 3.3.0 (bisected to BQL support for e1000e) Ben Greear
2012-04-20  2:39 ` Tom Herbert
2012-04-20  6:44   ` Ying Cai
2012-04-20 19:00   ` Ben Greear
2012-04-20 19:05     ` Tom Herbert
2012-04-20 19:13       ` Ben Greear
2012-04-20 19:44         ` John Fastabend
2012-04-20 21:21           ` Tom Herbert
2012-04-20 21:24             ` Ben Greear
2012-04-20 21:56             ` Ben Greear [this message]
2012-05-01 21:10               ` [E1000-devel] " Ben Greear
2012-05-01 21:49                 ` David Miller
2012-05-01 22:08                   ` Ben Greear
2012-05-01 22:42                     ` [E1000-devel] " Jeff Kirsher
2012-05-01 22:46                       ` David Miller
2012-05-01 22:52                         ` [E1000-devel] " Jeff Kirsher
2012-04-20  6:46 ` Dave, Tushar N

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F91DB7B.7060601@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=therbert@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).