From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] net/at91: at91_ether fixes for 3.4-rc
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:31:34 +0200
Message-ID: <4F992406.8020306@atmel.com>
References: <4F991210.8060409@atmel.com> <20120426.052006.1832921763623188173.davem@davemloft.net> <4F991E6D.4020303@atmel.com> <20120426.061212.570213998793556907.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <avictor.za@gmail.com>,
	<plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from eusmtp01.atmel.com ([212.144.249.242]:30019 "EHLO
	eusmtp01.atmel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1755046Ab2DZKbh (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 26 Apr 2012 06:31:37 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20120426.061212.570213998793556907.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On 04/26/2012 12:12 PM, David Miller :
> From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:07:41 +0200
> 
>> So, should I repost both of them as patch series?
> 
> Yes, with a leading "[PATCH 0/N] " posting as I asked.

Ok, done!

Thanks, bye,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre