netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Prasanna Panchamukhi <ppanchamukhi@riverbed.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bruce.w.allan@intel.com,
	jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	gospo@redhat.com, sassmann@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000e:  MSI interrupt test failed, using legacy interrupt
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:52:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F9AF8EB.60703@riverbed.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335490840.4056.137.camel@deadeye>

On 04/26/2012 06:40 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 17:05 -0700, prasanna.panchamukhi@riverbed.com
> wrote:
>> From: Prasanna S. Panchamukhi<ppanchamukhi@riverbed.com>
>>
>> Following logs where seen on Systems with multiple NICs&  ports,
>> while using MSI interrupts as shown below:
> [...]
>> This patch changes the IRQ tests to use polling loops starting with a
>> delay of 1 tick and doubling that if necessary up to a maximum total
>> delay of approximately 1 second.
> [...]
>
> I don't think you entirely understood my point.  This exponential
> back-off was the best I could come up with for a self-test
> (ethtool -t) where we have to answer the question 'are interrupts
> working' in a reasonable time, and the user can decide for themselves
> whether this was a false negative.
>
> If you want a definite answer in order to make an automatic decision
> about interrupt modes, there really is no valid time limit.  I think the
This issue is not able interrupt mode selection.

-Prasanna
> proper way to do interrupt mode selection in an in-tree driver is to
> rely on no-MSI quirks for chipsets and devices in the PCI core.
>
> Ben.
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel&#174; Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired

      reply	other threads:[~2012-04-27 19:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-27  0:05 [PATCH] e1000e: MSI interrupt test failed, using legacy interrupt prasanna.panchamukhi
2012-04-27  0:20 ` Jeff Kirsher
2012-04-27  0:42   ` Prasanna Panchamukhi
2012-04-27  0:46     ` Jeff Kirsher
2012-04-27  1:40 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-04-27 19:52   ` Prasanna Panchamukhi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F9AF8EB.60703@riverbed.com \
    --to=ppanchamukhi@riverbed.com \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=bruce.w.allan@intel.com \
    --cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=gospo@redhat.com \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prasanna.panchamukhi@riverbed.com \
    --cc=sassmann@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).