From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"gospo@redhat.com" <gospo@redhat.com>,
"sassmann@redhat.com" <sassmann@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 06/12] ixgbe: Hardware Timestamping + PTP Hardware Clock (PHC)
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 10:28:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB140BA.3070700@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120512053458.GC2190@netboy.at.omicron.at>
On 05/11/2012 10:34 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 07:23:44PM +0000, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
>>
>>
>> I believe this very rare case might be possible, but I don't think
>> that checking the ptp seqid will fix anything. In normal cases,
>> hardware latches Rx packet timestamp, then the ptp packet goes into
>> the queue and we process it shortly after. Before we process that
>> packet there will never be another packet in the queue that needs a
>> timestamp. We know this because the hardware stops timestamping
>> until we unlatch the RX registers. This should mean we don't need to
>> check the sequence ID, and spending time doing it would never fix
>> the issue you are talking about.
>>
>> The issue is for when a packet is timestamped and then never reaches
>> the queue. Then the rx stamp registers are locked for good, because
>> we never clear them, and hardware would never timestamp another
>> receive packet. I don't know a good solution to this, except to
>> clear the registers periodically. Do you have any suggestions?
>
> Well, one solution would be to check every received packet with the
> BPF in ptp_classify.h (whenever Rx time stamping is enabled).
>
> When the driver finds an event packet in the Rx queue, and
> TSYNCRXCTL[RXTT] is set, it reads out the time stamp along with
> RXSATRL/H. If the fields match, then add the time stamp to the skb.
>
> [ Or perhaps instead of using RXSATRL/H, just use the descriptor bit.
> If *not* set, then the time stamp does not belong to this packet. ]
>
> HTH,
> Richard
Ok, this sounds like a good plan. Considering that the device already
doesn't allow timestamping of other types of packets, so it doesn't need
to be general purpose.
Am I correct in thinking all I need to do is check the type and if it
matches the currently configured rx timestamp mode, then double check
the bit for whether a timestamp is available, and whether the descriptor
had a timestamp bit enabled?
Thanks
- Jake
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-14 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-10 6:46 [net-next 00/12][pull request] Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates Jeff Kirsher
2012-05-10 6:46 ` [net-next 01/12] igb: output register's information related to RX/TX queue[4-15] Jeff Kirsher
2012-05-10 6:46 ` [net-next 02/12] ixgbe: Exit on error case in VF message processing Jeff Kirsher
2012-05-10 6:46 ` [net-next 03/12] ixgbe: Clean up priority based flow control Jeff Kirsher
2012-05-10 6:46 ` [net-next 04/12] ixgbe: Set Drop_EN bit when multiple Rx queues are present w/o " Jeff Kirsher
2012-05-10 6:46 ` [net-next 05/12] ixgbe: Fix bogus error message Jeff Kirsher
2012-05-10 6:46 ` [net-next 06/12] ixgbe: Hardware Timestamping + PTP Hardware Clock (PHC) Jeff Kirsher
2012-05-10 14:11 ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-10 21:53 ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-05-11 5:15 ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-11 18:05 ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-05-11 19:23 ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-05-12 5:34 ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-14 17:28 ` Jacob Keller [this message]
2012-05-14 22:42 ` Jacob Keller
2012-05-15 5:32 ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-11 19:34 ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-05-12 5:24 ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-10 6:46 ` [net-next 07/12] ixgbe: Enable timesync clock-out feature for PPS support on X540 Jeff Kirsher
2012-05-10 14:17 ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-10 21:54 ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-05-11 5:36 ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-11 18:09 ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-05-10 22:08 ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-05-11 5:40 ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-11 18:10 ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-05-10 6:46 ` [net-next 08/12] ixgbe: correct disable_rx_buff timeout Jeff Kirsher
2012-05-10 6:46 ` [net-next 09/12] ixgbe: add support for get_ts_info Jeff Kirsher
2012-05-10 6:46 ` [net-next 10/12] ixgbe: support software timestamping Jeff Kirsher
2012-05-10 6:46 ` [net-next 11/12] ixgbe: cleanup the hwmon function calls Jeff Kirsher
2012-05-10 6:46 ` [net-next 12/12] ixgbe: update version number Jeff Kirsher
2012-05-11 3:18 ` [net-next 00/12][pull request] Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FB140BA.3070700@intel.com \
--to=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gospo@redhat.com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=sassmann@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).