From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Glauber Costa Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] decrement static keys on real destroy time Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 11:04:43 +0400 Message-ID: <4FB3518B.3090205@parallels.com> References: <1336767077-25351-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1336767077-25351-3-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <4FB058D8.6060707@jp.fujitsu.com> <4FB3431C.3050402@parallels.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , , , Tejun Heo , Li Zefan , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4FB3431C.3050402-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 05/16/2012 10:03 AM, Glauber Costa wrote: >> BTW, what is the relationship between 1/2 and 2/2 ? > Can't do jump label patching inside an interrupt handler. They need to > happen when we free the structure, and I was about to add a worker > myself when I found out we already have one: just we don't always use it. > > Before we merge it, let me just make sure the issue with config Li > pointed out don't exist. I did test it, but since I've reposted this > many times with multiple tiny changes - the type that will usually get > us killed, I'd be more comfortable with an extra round of testing if > someone spotted a possibility. > > Who is merging this fix, btw ? > I find it to be entirely memcg related, even though it touches a file in > net (but a file with only memcg code in it) > For the record, I compiled test it many times, and the problem that Li wondered about seems not to exist.