From: Gao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
serge.hallyn@canonical.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
dlezcano@fr.ibm.com, Gao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/17] netfilter: add struct nf_proto_net for register l4proto sysctl
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 10:28:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC03FD1.2050408@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FBF207D.80809@cn.fujitsu.com>
于 2012年05月25日 14:02, Gao feng 写道:
> 于 2012年05月25日 10:54, Pablo Neira Ayuso 写道:
>> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 09:05:34AM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
>>> 于 2012年05月24日 22:38, Pablo Neira Ayuso 写道:
>>>> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:54:42PM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>> I don't see why we need this new field.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It seems to be set to 1 in each structure that has set:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> .ctl_compat_table
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> to non-NULL. So, it's redundant.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Moreover, you already know from the protocol tracker itself if you
>>>>>>>> have to allocate the compat ctl table or not.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In other words: You set compat to 1 for nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic.
>>>>>>>> Then, you pass that compat value to generic_init_net via ->inet_net
>>>>>>>> again, but this information (that determines if the compat has to be
>>>>>>>> done or not) is already in the scope of the protocol tracker.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> because some protocols such l4proto_tcp6 and l4proto_tcp use the same init_net
>>>>>>> function. the l4proto_tcp6 doesn't need compat sysctl, so we should use this new
>>>>>>> field to identify if we should kmemdup compat_sysctl_table.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then, could you use two init_net functions? one for TCP for IPv4 and another
>>>>>> for TCP for IPv6?
>>>>>
>>>>> Of cause, if you prefer to impletment it in this way.
>>>>
>>>> If this removes the .compat field that you added, then use two
>>>> init_net functions, yes.
>>>
>>> Sorry I miss something.
>>>
>>> nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl also uses .compat to identify if we
>>> can unregister the compat sysctl.
>>>
>>> if we register l4proto_tcp and l4proto_tcp6 both. without .compat,
>>> when unregister l4proto_tcp6, the compat sysctl will be unregister too.
>>>
>>> So maybe we have to use .compat.
>>
>> Could you resolve this by checking pn->ctl_compat_header != NULL ?
>
> pn->ctl_table_header and ctl_compat_header is shared by l4proto_tcp and l4proto_tcp6.
> if we both register l4proto_tcp and l4proto_tcp6, when unregister l4proto_tcp6
> pn->ctl_compat_header must not be NULL.
>
Maybe we can resolve this by nf_conntrack_l4proto.l3proto == AF_INET && pn->ctl_compat_header != NULL
Because compat sysctl is registered by AF_INET's proto only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-26 2:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-14 8:52 [PATCH v3 00/17] netfilter: add namespace support for netfilter protos Gao feng
2012-05-14 8:52 ` [PATCH 01/17] netfilter: add struct nf_proto_net for register l4proto sysctl Gao feng
2012-05-23 10:12 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-05-24 1:35 ` Gao feng
2012-05-24 9:58 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-05-24 10:54 ` Gao feng
2012-05-24 14:38 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-05-25 1:05 ` Gao feng
2012-05-25 2:54 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-05-25 6:02 ` Gao feng
2012-05-26 2:28 ` Gao feng [this message]
2012-05-28 9:53 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-05-14 8:52 ` [PATCH 02/17] netfilter: add namespace support for l4proto Gao feng
2012-05-23 10:25 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-05-24 1:52 ` Gao feng
2012-05-24 10:00 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-05-14 8:52 ` [PATCH 03/17] netfilter: add namespace support for l3proto Gao feng
2012-05-23 10:29 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-05-24 1:58 ` Gao feng
2012-05-24 10:04 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-05-24 10:57 ` Gao feng
2012-05-14 8:52 ` [PATCH 04/17] netfilter: add namespace support for l4proto_generic Gao feng
2012-05-23 10:32 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-05-24 1:13 ` Gao feng
2012-05-24 9:52 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-05-24 11:07 ` Gao feng
2012-05-24 14:40 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-05-26 2:36 ` Gao feng
2012-05-28 9:54 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-05-14 8:52 ` [PATCH 05/17] netfilter: add namespace support for l4proto_tcp Gao feng
2012-05-25 3:00 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-05-25 6:05 ` Gao feng
2012-05-14 8:52 ` [PATCH 06/17] netfilter: add namespace support for l4proto_udp Gao feng
2012-05-14 8:52 ` [PATCH 07/17] netfilter: add namespace support for l4proto_icmp Gao feng
2012-05-14 8:52 ` [PATCH 08/17] netfilter: add namespace support for l4proto_icmpv6 Gao feng
2012-05-14 8:52 ` [PATCH 09/17] netfilter: add namespace support for l3proto_ipv4 Gao feng
2012-05-14 8:52 ` [PATCH 10/17] netfilter: add namespace support for l3proto_ipv6 Gao feng
2012-05-14 8:52 ` [PATCH 11/17] netfilter: add namespace support for l4proto_sctp Gao feng
2012-05-14 8:52 ` [PATCH 12/17] netfilter: add namespace support for l4proto_udplite Gao feng
2012-05-14 8:52 ` [PATCH 13/17] netfilter: adjust l4proto_dccp to the nf_conntrack_l4proto_register Gao feng
2012-05-14 8:52 ` [PATCH 14/17] netfilter: adjust l4proto_gre4 " Gao feng
2012-05-14 8:52 ` [PATCH 15/17] netfilter: cleanup sysctl for l4proto and l3proto Gao feng
2012-05-23 10:38 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-05-24 0:59 ` Gao feng
2012-05-24 9:56 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-05-14 8:52 ` [PATCH 16/17] netfilter: add namespace support for cttimeout Gao feng
2012-05-23 10:41 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-05-24 1:04 ` Gao feng
2012-05-14 8:52 ` [PATCH 17/17] netfilter: cttimeout use pernet data of l4proto Gao feng
2012-05-21 8:52 ` [PATCH v3 00/17] netfilter: add namespace support for netfilter protos Gao feng
2012-05-23 10:42 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-04-27 9:37 [PATCH v2 " Gao feng
2012-04-27 9:37 ` [PATCH 01/17] netfilter: add struct nf_proto_net for register l4proto sysctl Gao feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FC03FD1.2050408@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=dlezcano@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gaofeng@cn.fujitus.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).