netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Boot <bootc@bootc.net>
To: Chris Boot <bootc@bootc.net>
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	nix@esperi.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] e1000e: Disable ASPM L1 on 82574
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 22:17:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC93154.1060906@bootc.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335216578-21542-2-git-send-email-bootc@bootc.net>

On 23/04/2012 22:29, Chris Boot wrote:
> ASPM on the 82574 causes trouble. Currently the driver disables L0s for
> this NIC but only disables L1 if the MTU is >1500. This patch simply
> causes L1 to be disabled regardless of the MTU setting.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Boot <bootc@bootc.net>
> Cc: "Wyborny, Carolyn" <carolyn.wyborny@intel.com>
> Cc: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/19/362
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/82571.c |    3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/82571.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/82571.c
> index b3fdc69..c6d95f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/82571.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/82571.c
> @@ -2061,8 +2061,9 @@ const struct e1000_info e1000_82574_info = {
>  				  | FLAG_HAS_SMART_POWER_DOWN
>  				  | FLAG_HAS_AMT
>  				  | FLAG_HAS_CTRLEXT_ON_LOAD,
> -	.flags2			  = FLAG2_CHECK_PHY_HANG
> +	.flags2			= FLAG2_CHECK_PHY_HANG
>  				  | FLAG2_DISABLE_ASPM_L0S
> +				  | FLAG2_DISABLE_ASPM_L1
>  				  | FLAG2_NO_DISABLE_RX,
>  	.pba			= 32,
>  	.max_hw_frame_size	= DEFAULT_JUMBO,

Now that this patch is in master (d4a4206e) and has presumably been
widely tested, what's the possibility of it making it into stable? I
really should have included a CC to stable when I sent it...

This patch should probably also be accompanied with 59aed952 (e1000e:
Remove special case for 82573/82574 ASPM L1 disablement) on top, to
remove a special case that's no longer required once this is applied.

Thanks,
Chris

-- 
Chris Boot
bootc@bootc.net


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel&#174; Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-06-01 21:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-27 22:01 e1000e interface hang on 82574L Chris Boot
2011-12-27 22:33 ` Dave Taht
2011-12-31  9:31 ` Chris Boot
2012-01-03  0:02   ` Wyborny, Carolyn
2012-01-04 17:12     ` Chris Boot
2012-01-15 11:10       ` Chris Boot
2012-01-16 15:56         ` Wyborny, Carolyn
2012-01-16 16:04           ` Chris Boot
2012-03-17 15:59             ` Chris Boot
2012-03-17 17:54               ` Chris Boot
2012-03-17 23:50                 ` Nix
2012-03-19 14:59                 ` Wyborny, Carolyn
2012-03-19 16:19                   ` Nix
2012-03-19 16:29                     ` [E1000-devel] " Wyborny, Carolyn
2012-03-19 17:31                       ` Nix
2012-04-06 10:17                         ` Chris Boot
2012-04-06 12:12                           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-04-06 13:41                             ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-04-06 13:48                               ` Chris Boot
2012-04-06 16:05                               ` Nix
2012-04-06 16:04                             ` Nix
2012-04-23 21:29                   ` [PATCH RFC 0/2] e1000e: 82574 also needs ASPM L1 completely disabled Chris Boot
2012-04-23 21:29                     ` [PATCH 1/2] e1000e: Disable ASPM L1 on 82574 Chris Boot
2012-04-23 23:18                       ` Jeff Kirsher
2012-04-24 11:08                       ` Nix
2012-06-01 21:17                       ` Chris Boot [this message]
2012-06-07  1:41                         ` Greg KH
2012-04-23 21:29                     ` [PATCH 2/2] e1000e: Remove special case for 82573/82574 ASPM L1 disablement Chris Boot
2012-04-23 23:18                       ` Jeff Kirsher
2012-04-23 23:11                     ` [PATCH RFC 0/2] e1000e: 82574 also needs ASPM L1 completely disabled Jesse Brandeburg
2012-04-29 16:45                       ` Nix
2012-04-29 18:03                         ` Chris Boot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FC93154.1060906@bootc.net \
    --to=bootc@bootc.net \
    --cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nix@esperi.org.uk \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).