From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Fastabend Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: Fix corrupted queue_mapping Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 09:16:15 -0700 Message-ID: <4FD2254F.1090900@intel.com> References: <1339135057.6001.20.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20120607.230216.2014005732863772019.davem@davemloft.net> <1339135881.6001.25.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20120607.231501.463746858434969001.davem@davemloft.net> <1339138040.6001.39.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1339140238.6001.42.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1339168272.6001.116.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Tom Herbert , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:57717 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761221Ab2FHQQQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jun 2012 12:16:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1339168272.6001.116.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 6/8/2012 8:11 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 08:04 -0700, Tom Herbert wrote: > >> Maybe the fundamental issue is that the queue mappings only allow for >> one level of multi queue device. It might be better if bonding didn't >> have one and dev_pick_tx did the right thin (use xps on bonding >> maybe). > > bonding misuses multiqueue infrastructure to divert frames on selected > slaves, or maybe I am wrong. > This is right see bond_slave_override() here the slaves queue_ids are mapped to skb->queue_mapping via this TX_QUEUE_OVERRIDE param.