From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jhautbois@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression on TX throughput when using bonding
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:46:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FDA2364.9090508@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL8zT=joBA5pgXB7QfDM5qhOizmdneghXsSnwN5G74-yoGzg_Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/14/2012 08:43 AM, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
> As suggested by Eric, here is a description I wish to be as precise as possible.
> I send three RAW video frames, 1920x1088@30fps on three udp sockets to
> the same NIC.
> Each sending is in a thread, so I will focus on the numbers for one thread.
>
> This generates burst of send(), as this : each 1/30s send 3.133.440
> bytes to the ethernet interface.
> This is in fact something similar to this :
> while (n != 0)
> {
> sendto(socket, packet, 4000);
> n -= 4000;
> packet += 4000
> }
>
> My interface is a bond with a 10Gbps interface and MTU set to 4096.
> This means I have 784 packets each 1/30s which are sent on my
> interface by one thread, then I wait for the next burst, and so on.
> The videos are not necessarily the same video, so the threads may send
> simultaneously or not...
>
> My socket is in blocking mode.
If desired, here is how to simulate that with netperf:
./configure --enable-intervals
make
And an example over loopback:
raj@tardy:~/netperf2_trunk$ src/netperf -l 10 -t UDP_STREAM -H localhost
-w 33 -b 783 -- -s 1M -S 1M -m 4000
MIGRATED UDP STREAM TEST from ::0 (::) port 0 AF_INET6 to tardy (::1)
port 0 AF_INET6 : interval
Socket Message Elapsed Messages
Size Size Time Okay Errors Throughput
bytes bytes secs # # 10^6bits/sec
2097152 4000 9.99 260739 0 835.18
2097152 9.99 260442 834.23
Adjust the -s and/or -S options to match what Jean-Michel's application
uses for socket buffer sizes. Run another two simultaneous instances to
get the three streams. Adjust the run length with the -l option.
happy benchmarking,
rick jones
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-14 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-14 8:58 Regression on TX throughput when using bonding Jean-Michel Hautbois
2012-06-14 9:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-14 9:40 ` Jean-Michel Hautbois
2012-06-14 9:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-14 10:00 ` David Miller
2012-06-14 10:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-14 10:31 ` David Miller
2012-06-14 16:42 ` [PATCH] net: remove skb_orphan_try() Eric Dumazet
2012-06-15 7:15 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2012-06-15 22:31 ` David Miller
2012-06-14 10:15 ` Regression on TX throughput when using bonding Jean-Michel Hautbois
2012-06-14 14:14 ` Jean-Michel Hautbois
2012-06-14 14:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-14 15:43 ` Jean-Michel Hautbois
2012-06-14 17:46 ` Rick Jones [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FDA2364.9090508@hp.com \
--to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jhautbois@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).