From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fan Du Subject: Re: [XFRM][RFC v1] Fix unexpected SA hard expiration after setting new date Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:53:05 +0800 Message-ID: <4FDEEC71.50302@windriver.com> References: <1340007856-27651-1-git-send-email-fan.du@windriver.com> <20120618084021.GA24902@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: , , To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com ([147.11.146.13]:50506 "EHLO mail1.windriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752599Ab2FRIv6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jun 2012 04:51:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120618084021.GA24902@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2012=E5=B9=B406=E6=9C=8818=E6=97=A5 16:40, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 04:24:15PM +0800, fan.du wrote: >> >> So, could you please give your comments on this? > > Well, this used to work back when we were using relative time > instead of absolute time. Then someone came along and changed > it for suspend/resume. > > I didn't like this new behaviour but Dave convinced me that > it is a good thing :) > One of our custom complained the networking down when changing date, even it's only less than 10 seconds, but they complain anyway:) So it probably hurts much in practice for tel comm company. > I guess I can live with your workaround if Dave is happy with > it. But IMHO we should just go back to relative time and fix > the suspend/resume user-space scripts instead. Ok, let's see what Dave will say about this. And thanks for your comments. > > Cheers, --=20 Love each day! --fan