From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Greear Subject: Re: [RFC] TCP: Support configurable delayed-ack parameters. Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:27:09 -0700 Message-ID: <4FE0EEAD.7050601@candelatech.com> References: <1340067163-29329-1-git-send-email-greearb@candelatech.com> <1340082688.7491.2299.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <4FE0A4CF.6000906@candelatech.com> <20120619.142158.2026176205742396086.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, dbaluta@ixiacom.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172]:51148 "EHLO ns3.lanforge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754882Ab2FSV15 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jun 2012 17:27:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120619.142158.2026176205742396086.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/19/2012 02:21 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Ben Greear > Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 09:11:59 -0700 > >> Dave..any opinion on this? I'll be happy to get rid of the >> multiply caching if it's agreed that it should not be there. > > I disagree fundamentally with the feature. > > I can't believe for one minute that we can't do ACK stretching > dynamically using reasonable heuristics. > > And, as Stephen said, we already have too many damn knobs. Ok...I'll let someone else take a stab at that. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com