From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oliver Hartkopp Subject: Awaiting upsteam? - Re: [PATCH net-next v3] em_canid: Ematch rule to match CAN frames according to their identifiers Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 07:15:49 +0200 Message-ID: <4FF28005.4050108@hartkopp.net> References: <1341241568-13438-1-git-send-email-lisovy@gmail.com> <4FF1DF65.5080306@hartkopp.net> <4FF1E26F.5000106@hartkopp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-can@vger.kernel.org, lartc@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de ([81.169.146.161]:33335 "EHLO mo-p00-ob.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751843Ab2GCFPx (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2012 01:15:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4FF1E26F.5000106@hartkopp.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello Dave, i've seen that you tagged this patch as "Awaiting upstream" in Patchwork. Does this mean, that *you* are waiting for another re-spin of the patch OR do you expect this patch go through a sub-tree like Marcs can-next tree? Who is committing these "awaiting upstream" patches? Thanks for clarification, Oliver