From: "Shirish Pargaonkar" <shirishpargaonkar@gmail.com>
To: "Sridhar Samudrala" <sri@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-net@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: autotuning of send buffer size of a socket
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 23:18:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4a4634330805142118l47d023caxf79a45273f4f7a28@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1210639647.2753.10.camel@w-sridhar2.beaverton.ibm.com>
On 5/12/08, Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 14:00 -0500, Shirish Pargaonkar wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > kernel_sendmsg fails with error EAGAIN, yet I no matter how long I try,
> > I still get the same error and do not see the send buffer size of a socket
> > changing (increasing)
> >
> > The initial buffer sizes are 16384 for send side and 87380 for the receive
> > side but I see receive side buffer tuning but do not see the same with
> > send side.
> >
> > If tcp does not see a need to increase the send buffer size, wonder why I
> > get EAGAIN error on this non-blocking socket for kernel_sendmsg!
>
> I think the send buffer auto-tuning doesn't happen here because there is
> already congestion window worth of packets sent that are not yet acknowledged.
> See tcp_should_expand_sndbuf().
Sridhar,
The unacked (packets_out) is 7 and snd_cwnd is 9, so that should not be
the case for tcp_should_expand_sndbuf to return 0 right?
>
> Also, the comments for tcp_new_space() says that sndbuf expansion does
> not work well with largesends. What is the size of your sends?
>
> Adding netdev to the CC list.
>
> Thanks
> Sridhar
>
> >
> > I do subscribe to this mailing list so, please send your responses to this
> > mail address.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Shirish
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > uname -r
> > 2.6.18-91.el5
> >
> > sysctl -a
> >
> > net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 87380 4194304
> > net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096 16384 4194304
> > net.ipv4.tcp_mem = 98304 131072 196608
> >
> > net.core.rmem_default = 126976
> > net.core.wmem_default = 126976
> > net.core.rmem_max = 131071
> > net.core.wmem_max = 131071
> >
> > net.ipv4.tcp_window_scaling = 1
> > net.ipv4.tcp_timestamps = 1
> > net.ipv4.tcp_moderate_rcvbuf = 1
> >
> >
> > cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_moderate_rcvbuf
> > 1
> >
> >
> > CIFS VFS: sndbuf 16384 rcvbuf 87380
> >
> > CIFS VFS: sends on sock 0000000009903100, sendbuf 34776, rcvbuf 190080
> > stuck for 32 seconds,
> > error: -11
> > CIFS VFS: sends on sock 0000000009903a00, sndbuf 34776, rcvbuf 138240
> > stuck for 32 seconds,
> > error: -11
> >
> >
> > CIFS VFS: sends on sock 0000000009903100, sndbuf 34776, rcvbuf 126720
> > stuck for 64 seconds,
> > error: -11
> >
> > CIFS VFS: sends on sock 0000000009903100, sndbuf 34776, rcvbuf 222720
> > stuck for 256 seconds,
> > error: -11
> >
> > I see the socket receive buffer size fluctuating (tcp_moderate_rcvbuf
> > is 1) but not
> > the socket send buffer size.
> > The send buffer size remains fixed, the auto-tuning for send side is
> > enabled by default,so I do not see it happening here no matter how
> > long the c ode tries to
> > kernel_sendmsg after receiving EAGAIN return code.
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-15 4:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4a4634330805121200m739e67bdife66c3ad81af1ceb@mail.gmail.com>
2008-05-13 0:47 ` autotuning of send buffer size of a socket Sridhar Samudrala
2008-05-13 0:51 ` David Miller
2008-05-13 13:54 ` Shirish Pargaonkar
2008-05-13 23:48 ` Sridhar Samudrala
2008-05-14 14:22 ` Shirish Pargaonkar
2008-05-14 18:11 ` Shirish Pargaonkar
2008-05-14 18:26 ` Jeremy Jackson
2008-05-14 18:37 ` Shirish Pargaonkar
2008-05-14 20:23 ` Shirish Pargaonkar
2008-05-15 4:18 ` Shirish Pargaonkar [this message]
2008-05-15 15:00 ` Shirish Pargaonkar
2008-05-15 17:40 ` Sridhar Samudrala
2008-05-15 18:03 ` Shirish Pargaonkar
2008-05-15 18:49 ` Shirish Pargaonkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4a4634330805142118l47d023caxf79a45273f4f7a28@mail.gmail.com \
--to=shirishpargaonkar@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sri@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).