From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: David Barmann <david.barmann@stackpath.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sock: Reset dst when changing sk_mark via setsockopt
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 14:58:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4a6b111a-c0d2-e12c-bc42-3c723a0297bc@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181107223327.GA21018@konacove.com>
On 11/07/2018 02:33 PM, David Barmann wrote:
> When setting the SO_MARK socket option, the dst needs to be reset so
> that a new route lookup is performed.
>
> This fixes the case where an application wants to change routing by
> setting a new sk_mark. If this is done after some packets have already
> been sent, the dst is cached and has no effect.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Barmann <david.barmann@stackpath.com>
> ---
> net/core/sock.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index 6fcc4bc07d19..187badac24a3 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -950,10 +950,14 @@ int sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
> clear_bit(SOCK_PASSSEC, &sock->flags);
> break;
> case SO_MARK:
> - if (!ns_capable(sock_net(sk)->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
> + if (!ns_capable(sock_net(sk)->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN)) {
> ret = -EPERM;
> - else
> + } else {
> + struct dst_entry *dst = sk_dst_get(sk);
> sk->sk_mark = val;
> + sk_dst_reset(sk);
sk_dst_get() and dst_release() seems extra overhead ?
net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c do_ip_setsockopt() has a similar handling for IP_TOS,
and it only calls sk_dst_reset() (If the new TOS is different than the current one)
So I would suggest :
if (!ns_capable(...)) {
ret = -EPERM;
} else if (val != sk->sk_mark) {
sk->sk_mark = val;
sk_dst_reset(sk);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-08 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-07 22:33 [PATCH net-next] sock: Reset dst when changing sk_mark via setsockopt David Barmann
2018-11-07 22:58 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2018-11-07 23:07 ` David Barmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4a6b111a-c0d2-e12c-bc42-3c723a0297bc@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=david.barmann@stackpath.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).