From: Venkat Venkatsubra <venkat.x.venkatsubra@oracle.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: When TCP keepalives tuned shorter than retransmission timeouts
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 07:51:55 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4b6029b3-55da-441a-9550-0fed3b49506a@default> (raw)
Some of our customers have tcp socket level options set to:
TCP_KEEPIDLE 60
TCP_KEEPINTVL 6
TCP_KEEPCNT 10
And when the peer is dead they expect the connection to timeout in 2 minutes instead of the
15 minutes from retransmission timeouts.
(We know the tunables are set very low.)
As this code in tcp_keepalive_timer() indicates we skip keepalive probes if there are packets in flight
Or we have more data to send:
/* It is alive without keepalive 8) */
if (tp->packets_out || tcp_send_head(sk))
goto resched;
The reason I guess is why burden the network with keepalive packets when
somebody else (retransmissions) is doing it for you.
The change we tried was to not actually send the keepalive probes in this situation but keep counting them as sent.
To not do this when the receiver window is closed we check tp->snd_wnd. Maybe there are other (more correct ?) ways to do that.
By the way, we didn't try to address yet the similar issue when the communication with peer dies
after the receiver closes the window.
This is the code change we tried.
--- tcp_timer.c.orig 2013-11-25 07:09:18.328112851 -0800
+++ tcp_timer.c 2013-11-25 08:06:47.339666980 -0800
@@ -588,18 +588,13 @@
}
}
tcp_send_active_reset(sk, GFP_ATOMIC);
- goto death;
+ tcp_done(sk);
+ goto out;
}
if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_KEEPOPEN) || sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSE)
goto out;
- elapsed = keepalive_time_when(tp);
-
- /* It is alive without keepalive 8) */
- if (tp->packets_out || tcp_send_head(sk))
- goto resched;
-
elapsed = keepalive_time_elapsed(tp);
if (elapsed >= keepalive_time_when(tp)) {
@@ -615,8 +610,9 @@
tcp_write_err(sk);
goto out;
}
- if (tcp_write_wakeup(sk) <= 0) {
- icsk->icsk_probes_out++;
+ if (tp->packets_out || tcp_send_head(sk) || (tcp_write_wakeup(sk) <= 0)) {
+ if (tp->snd_wnd)
+ icsk->icsk_probes_out++;
elapsed = keepalive_intvl_when(tp);
} else {
/* If keepalive was lost due to local congestion,
@@ -631,12 +627,7 @@
sk_mem_reclaim(sk);
-resched:
inet_csk_reset_keepalive_timer (sk, elapsed);
- goto out;
-
-death:
- tcp_done(sk);
out:
bh_unlock_sock(sk);
We seek your opinion.
Thanks.
Venkat
next reply other threads:[~2013-11-26 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-26 15:51 Venkat Venkatsubra [this message]
2013-11-26 16:20 ` When TCP keepalives tuned shorter than retransmission timeouts Eric Dumazet
2013-12-04 21:50 ` Venkat Venkatsubra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4b6029b3-55da-441a-9550-0fed3b49506a@default \
--to=venkat.x.venkatsubra@oracle.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox